|
GETTING PERSONAL: Telecommuter Taxes Could Get Simpler
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Telecommuters will be able to use employer-supplied
computers for personal use -- and not have to pay for them -- if a proposal in
President Bush's 2006 budget is passed into law.
Currently, people working from home using computers, software and other
office equipment provided by their employers are expected to keep a log of how much
time they spend using the equipment for purposes other than work, whether
it's surfing the Web for that birthday present they've been meaning to buy or
checking personal e-mail accounts.
About 3% of all private-industry nonagricultural workers in the U.S. have an
employer-provided home personal computer, as do 4% of all private-industry
white-collar workers, according to a March 2004 National Compensation Survey
conducted by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
"It's a bookkeeping nightmare," says Cindy Hockenberry, an enrolled agent and
tax-information analyst at the National Association of Tax Professionals, a
professional organization in Appleton, Wis.
The fair value of that non-business use is supposed to be added to the
employee's gross income, on which the employee would have to pay taxes, adds Tom
Ochsenschlager, vice president, taxation, for the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants.
The new proposal, however, would eliminate that requirement, in an effort to
reduce the burden imposed on telecommuters (at least the honest ones actually
keeping logs) and their employers. Employer-provided computers and other
equipment wouldn't have to be included in your income, so long as it's necessary to
perform your work from home, even if the equipment is there only for standby
use during work closures, such as during a blizzard or the threat of a
terrorist attack. If the proposal were to pass, it would become effective for taxable
years after Dec. 31, 2005, the budget said.
Still, the computer-tax issue pales in comparison to another tax burden some
telecommuters must bear. Most states tax income based on where you were when
you earned your money. So if you split your hours between two different states,
each state would only tax you on income earned in its territory.
However, New York, for instance, may tax nonresidents working for New York
companies on 100% of their income, regardless of where the work was performed.
If the worker's state of residence also taxes the income earned at home, in
their state, the telecommuter is taxed twice. While New York will issue a credit
if it is a necessity to perform the work out of state (for instance, being a
sales representative on the West Coast for a New York company), very little is
actually considered a necessity, explains Nicole Belson Goluboff, author of
"The Law of Telecommuting" and a lawyer specializing in telework issues.
"This is a very significant issue for telecommuters," she adds. "With
increasing frequency, companies are realizing that telecommuting is a vital part of
contingency plans for (certain situations), whether it's a major power outage,
a heightened terror alert, or transit strike, or any situation where most
people would agree it would be more productive to have employees working from
home. While Congress has demonstrated its interest in stepping in,(there is)no
federal legislation as of yet."
Thomas Huckaby, a computer programmer from Nashville who worked for a New
York company, challenged the New York law and lost his first appeal last year.
Huckaby spent roughly 25% of his working hours in New York between 1994 and
1995, though New York decided that 100% of his income should be subject to the
state's income taxes. He took his case to the state's highest court, where oral
arguments were heard in January; a decision is expected soon.
"The judges clearly thought about the issue and had really good questions,"
said Peter L. Faber, who represents Huckaby and is a partner at McDermott Will
& Emery's New York office. But, "it could really go either way."
(Tara Siegel Bernard is one of four Getting Personal columnists who write
about personal-finance issues ranging from new tax proposals to education-funding
strategies to estate planning.)
-By Tara Siegel Bernard; Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5288;
tara.siegel@dowjones.com [ 02-09-05 1419ET ]
|