President’s Corner
TelCoa thanks U.S. Representatives Jim Himes, Rosa DeLauro, and Elizabeth Esty for introducing the Multi-State Worker Tax Fairness Act, H.R. 4085, 113th Congress. We strongly support this crucial legislation. The bill would finally eliminate the telecommuter tax, a steep penalty often resulting in double taxation of income that interstate telecommuters earn at home. The telecommuter tax unfairly burdens telecommuters and their employers and limits telework adoption. Congress must make the Multi-State Worker Tax Fairness Act law! TelCoa and other advocates are working to secure the bill’s enactment, but we need your help! >>> Read More...
Guest Columnist
4 Great Examples of Telework’s Impact by: Brie Weiler Reynolds As champions of telecommuting and flexible work options for all, we certainly don’t have to tell TelCoa readers about the benefits of telework--we all know and love them. But as organizations like ours work to spread awareness of, and support for, flexible ways of working, it’s really important to remember the individuals for whom we work--the millions of professionals whose lives would be positively impacted by more access to telework and flexible jobs. At 1 Million for Work Flexibility, we hear daily from supporters about why they support the expansion of flexible work options for all. Here are four great examples of why work flexibility, including telework, is vitally important to individuals, to companies, and to society. >>> Read the entire blog at...
Hot Topics & Links
"Working from home not for everyone, but it can still be a 'win-win' for many workers and employers" is an article in the Cleveland Plain Dealer featuring TelCoa President Chuck Wilsker and Advisory Board member Diane Stegmeier. For the complete article, > click-here... -------------------------

Delegate Boilerplate Letter

Dear Representative (name) OR Dear Senator (name):


I am writing to urge you to cosponsor the Multi-State Worker Tax Fairness Act (H.R. 4085; S. 2347). This legislation would eliminate a harsh tax penalty currently burdening interstate teleworkers and their employers.


The Multi-State Worker Tax Fairness Act would prohibit states from applying a rule commonly referred to as the “convenience of the employer” rule. In a state that maintains this rule, when a company employs a nonresident who chooses to telecommute some or most of the time, the state will tax the employee on 100% of his wages – not just the part of his salary he earns when he works in the state, but also the part he earns when he works at home, in a different state. Because telecommuters’ home states can also tax the wages they earn at home, many employees are double taxed for telecommuting across state lines.


Even telecommuters who live in states that impose no personal income tax are penalized for choosing to telecommute between states: Notwithstanding the choice they made to live in a state that imposes no income tax – and notwithstanding the fact that their home states may impose uncommonly high sales tax or other taxes to make up for the lack of income tax revenue – they must pay state income tax anyway, to their employer’s state instead of their own.


The tax penalty is a powerful deterrent to telework. Some workers are forced to reject the telework option because the convenience rule creates too much confusion about where they owe taxes. Other workers are forced to reject telework because the threat of double or excessive taxation makes this transportation alternative too expensive. The convenience rule also forces businesses to reject telework, creating tremendous confusion for payroll departments about where they must withhold for telecommuters and driving up compliance costs.


The tax penalty deals a harsh blow to commuters who need to telework when storms, transit failures, or other disruptions render roads and rails unusable. Other Americans hurt by the penalty include disabled war veterans and other Americans with disabilities for whom daily commuting or on-site work may be impossible; family caregivers of disabled Americans who need workplace flexibility to manage both care-giving and job responsibilities; military spouses who need portable jobs to avoid repeated unemployment as they move with their service members from base to base; older Americans with reduced mobility who need to phase in, defer, or come out of retirement; unemployed Americans who need to expand the region where they look for work; and small business owners who need a scattered workforce to build national enterprises with strong continuity of operations plans and minimal recruitment, turnover, and overhead expenses.


[Enter information describing your specific circumstances and how the tax penalty for telecommuting threatens your ability to rely on telework.]


The Multi-State Worker Tax Fairness Act would remove the penalty for telecommuting across state lines, barring states from taxing nonresidents on wages they earn when they are physically present in another state. By removing the tax obstacle to interstate telework, the measure would increase America’s transportation choices. It would also increase employment opportunities. These crucial gains would come at no cost to the federal government.


To help assure that the Internet is a viable commute option for multi-state workers, I respectfully request that you become a cosponsor of the Multi-State Worker Tax Fairness Act and press for its swift enactment.


If you have any questions, please contact me at (enter your contact information).


Thank you in advance for your support.




Follow Us
The Telework Coalition on Facebook The Telework Coalition on LinkedIn The Telework Coalition on twitter
Sign Up for Our Email Newsletter
Upcoming Events
Check back with us for upcoming events of interest.